Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do u agree or disagree?
The leader of an organization defines a path to his employees. Although the majority of these leaders around the globe are at an older age, some people argue that younger ones makes difference. I partially agree with this statement since both are required to make a successful organization.
Firstly, the elder leaders in the organization always help the rest in terms of their experience. Although the younger generation will be filled with a lot of new ideas, they lack the direction to carry on. As a result, it will take no time to understand that only an idea doesn’t make money but the correct implementation do make. For example, when a CEO of Infosys, who was in service for 35 years, retired, the shares of the company slashed within next six months. The prime reason for this is because the new CEO is left with no pre-set direction from his father.
Secondly, the old directors in many organizations will refuse to change although it is a demanding factor in this competitive environment. This is because they are used to traditional ways of performing tasks. As a consequence, the company stands to be outdated since they are unable to cope up with the current trend. But the younger management graduates from the prestigious institutes are smarter and are having different perspective towards organizational change. As they do things differently, they will understand the changes happening outside and will be able to update the company accordingly.
To conclude, as directors in many organizations are older, some people believe that the younger leaders make difference. However, I partly support this statement because the company success always depends when they both support each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able to update the company accordingly. To conclude, as directors in many organi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13214285714 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91615617496 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8099885669 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.8 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211106619866 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738320651131 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971896568605 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147675823202 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839052028281 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.