Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Learning history has been existing since time immemorial. Some think that knowing the past is of no importance and say that it is not useful to those living in the present. I agree with this thought owing to the fact that the knowledge gained will not be applicable and also think that the time and efforts can be spent on a useful subject.
First and foremost, the facts and information acquired through learning about the past will not be applicable in real life or to make a living. This will be of use to those ought to pursue to become historians or archaeologists or writers. Most of the usual jobs will require the subjective knowledge and also expect employees to be updated with the latest trends in their respective fields rather than having the knowledge of the past. Hence, learning about the past has no significance to the present generation.
Additionally, the time allocated to learn history can be utilized to seek practical knowledge that will help to have better careers and prospects. For instance, if children at school are taught about the latest technological advancements in computers instead of battles fought back in the old ages or evolution of civilizations, it would help them to develop interest and gain knowledge on computers and keep up to the present. This would aid to shape better careers. So, learning history would not be worth in the present times.
In conclusion, learning and studying about the past is not important for the present generation because the knowledge is not effective in daily life and time spent can rather be used to have practical and subjective knowledge that will support their careers
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94265232975 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73092878338 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498207885305 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7261667691 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204339351653 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932700750478 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810251149758 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143340239829 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037688790884 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.