Life was better when technology was simpler.
To what extent do you agree and disagree?
It is fair to say that the life of people was superior when there were no high-tech machines. I undoubtedly agree with this notion as technology is the prime reason for increased tiredness and stress levels of people and taking them towards sedentary lifestyles.
Equipment and electronic devices of the twenty-first-century have killed the relaxing time of people and raised their stress as well. Everyone becomes addicted to electronic gadgets and the internet. Consequently, they have little time available for doing other physical activities-exercise, yoga and gyming, which are necessary to have a healthy and tension free life. The survey of the World Health Organization, to illustrate, stated that more than forty-two percent of people sleep late at night due to irresistible instinct towards social media applications, therefore, they are struggling with the problems of sleep deprivation and anxiety. Had these types of platforms not invented, people could have lived a relaxed and healthy life.
Moreover, technology has played an evident role in making people couch potato and consequently unhealthy. They now prefer to do all the work through computers and machines by sitting on a chair, which is leading to massive physical inactivity among them. Due to this reason, they are more prone to detrimental diseases such as obesity, heart attack and cancer. As per the report of the United States health department, more than seventy percent of employments now in the country are sitting jobs, which were only twenty percent in the nineties. Thus, it is the cause of obesity in the majority of American people.
To conclude, it is clear that the life of people was absolutely finer when there were no smartphones and computers because the evolution of technology has brought various mental and physical health complications, and turn us towards the unhealthy style of living.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33666666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98888868236 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596666666667 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8095982372 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130627296074 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431077444428 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567526547839 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955645615439 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619200506519 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.