Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, people opt to move to different countries for better career options and lifestyle. However, this may not be as simple as it sounds, as they have to face some severe social and practical challenges due to language difference. In my opinion, communicating in foreign language can give rise to tremendous daily life troubles.
The immediate problem people encounter is in making new friends. Inability to speak properly in foreign language and communicate thoughts and feelings clearly cause a setback for many. Therefore, they start avoiding talking to people to safe guard themselves from any miscommunication which can arise due to the lack of command. To share an example, one of my friend went to China for higher education. Being from India he had knew only English and Hindi, and Chinese was a new job for him to learn. His real time experience was that because of difference in the language, talking to native speakers became difficult as they preferred to talk in Chinese only. Initially, technology supported him to converse using google translator on smart phone but that turned out to be a time consuming and slow process. Finally, he ended up learning Chinese after realizing that his non-ability is creating hurdles for his future growth.
Moreover, people also encounter some practical challenges when the displays are in foreign languages such as ordering food at restaurants, reading article prices during shopping, and reading sign boards during driving. Such disconnect causes dissatisfaction and demotivation until they get versed with the local language.
Overall, living overseas is not a cup of cake especially where people have to interact in other language. Social and practical problems are bound to happen for an initial period while they learn new language and adopt to the new culture. Meanwhile, technology should be considered as the best friend for an intermediate solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...gher education. Being from India he had knew only English and Hindi, and Chinese was...
^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...eriod while they learn new language and adopt to the new culture. Meanwhile, technology ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27035830619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83336323935 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641693811075 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6042496679 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126884743131 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040294983743 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437305685381 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867878604671 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388258234385 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.