Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may lead to the extinction of animal life and human life.
To what extent to you agree of disagree?
Each and every living being on the planet earth is dependent on the natural resources. Since the evolution of the humans, exploitation of minerals and fossil fuels has increased exponentially. As a result, many plant and animal species, including humans are staring at the extinction. I completely agree with the given statement.
First of all, forests play a vital role in controlling the global warming because they are responsible for keeping the carbon dioxide levels under control. If the deforestation continues without foresight, the temperature increases, sea level rises, and as a result, millions of species will disappear from the face of the globe. There are number of credible studies that proved, we are responsible for disturbing the ecological balance. For example, Tiger numbers in India are falling rapidly and there are categorized as endangered animals because they are losing their lives to the growing population.
Secondly, losing green cover will increase the pollution levels. Many countries are already experiencing the side effects of cutting down the jungles, general public started using the air purifiers in their daily life. If reforestation does not happen and deforestation continues at the current scale, there will be dire consequences to the human lives. For example, in India and China, the population explosion lead to dramatic decrease in the tree cover and as a result, millions of people are dying because of the pollution related illnesses.
To conclude, I believe, preserving thick forests and retrieving lost bio-diversity is essential for the survival of the mankind and the animal kingdom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
...s increased exponentially. As a result, many plant and animal species, including humans ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...de effects of cutting down the jungles, general public started using the air purifiers in thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45882352941 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90867268323 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3794323145 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.076923077 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899959759279 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278255996613 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0263831408444 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531021620635 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156779683195 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.