some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and the homeless.
Do you agree or disagree?
Joblessness and the poverty have become a major issue in the developing countries. Many people argue that it is the government responsibility to care of the impoverished citizens. I completely agree with the statement, authorities should lend them a helping hand to make their lives better.
First of fall, irrespective to the social status of the general public, they are citizens of a particular country. Therefore, they are entitled to receive every benefit from the state. It is the government’s duty to look after their people, if someone is unemployed, poor and homeless, authorities should provide them a shelter and give monetary benefits to lead a comfortable life. For example, many countries in western hemisphere provide minimum income support to their backward class to keep them out of dire poverty. I believe, every country should adapt this strategy for the benefit of their own population, else there will be a huge income inequality.
Secondly, this policy reduces the poverty and increases the consumer spending. While providing the economic support, the jobless and the poor people must be trained with the skills that will be required to get a job. This strategy can show a positive ripple effect on the country’s GDP and standard of living. Some sections in the society criticize that free money makes people lazy. I believe, that opinion lies with the minority. For example, Scandinavian governments provide all the basic facilities to the under privileged sections by taxing the rich. As a result, their population enjoys the highest standard of living when compared to the rest of the world and their economies are considered to be most stable and developed.
To conclude, I strongly that no citizen of a country should be in the dark without help. All the impoverished must have the same rights as the rest of the population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rrespective to the social status of the general public, they are citizens of a particular coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16118421053 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89905292767 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582236842105 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8858679554 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8823529412 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124088851156 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383753428804 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562401741587 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778476289477 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476312791963 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.