Loneliness is an increasing problem in many societies, especially among the elderly. Why is this? How might it be remedied?
In this cutting-edge technology era, seclusion is an emerging social issue in the world. There are numerous possible reasons behind this burning issue. However, by taking some steps this problem can be resolved wisely. This essay will elaborate on the problems and solutions of this hot (crucial) issue in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, one of the major factors is the rising popularity of nuclear families. If we observe around us, it can be said that younger people are more inclined towards a single-family concept instead of living in an extended family. The young generation does not hesitate to abandon their parents and grandparents in a village to lead a better life in metropolitan cities. In addition, they will be busy in the rat race of urban life and forget their parents. Another crucial factor is the generation gap and it is widening day by day. This causes a clash of ideas among family members and disrespect towards older people. Elderly people, as a result, feel lonesome and get into depression. Apart from that, due to solitude in old age, many older people start losing their interest towards life. Negligence, lack of affection, and love from their younger ones are also discouraging them to have an active lifestyle and they lack their interest in their social lives.
Let us examine. How can these problems be solved? In order to solve this uncongenial situation, first of all, people should be encouraged to live in a joint family and they should spend quality time with older people. Living together will not only help the elderly but also help the young generation. Earlier elders used to be considered the back bone of any family because of their unconditional love and guidance to the youngsters. Moreover, by introducing the old-age club, they can live and mingle with same age people and can motivate each other to be livelier even in the later year of their lives.
To conclude, fast-paced life, changing family structures, and lack of love and affection are the main reasons behind developing this negative attitude among older people. There is no doubt that by adopting traditional ways of living and spend quality time by being more attentive towards them, we can help to live an active life.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition, no doubt, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96021220159 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58302054954 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562334217507 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8814404303 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0476190476 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180590258531 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571040899521 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478769503464 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118324975101 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389675171274 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, apart from, in addition, no doubt, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96021220159 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58302054954 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562334217507 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8814404303 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0476190476 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180590258531 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571040899521 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478769503464 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118324975101 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389675171274 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.