Advancements in technology of computers made people think that maintaining libraries is a waste of money. I completely disagree because it is the most traditional place which provides relevant books with no errors.
On one hand we see people busy with their computers and phones as easily availability of internet by the companies. Firstly, Internet data although provides many false information making a person confused with the correct or wrong. Secondly, data is given within a second to the user but only in a single available language.
Whereas, on the other hand, libraries are the old places where books are stored from past many centuries. Children of coming ages will get to know of old manuscripts and art of writing books. Books in libraries ar available in many languages with different volumes. The books are available with no possible errors giving pure information to people reading it.
To conclude, I believe that government aid must be given in maintaining libraries as it is the oldest method of reading books. Awareness among people must be raised to improve its fineness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much false information', 'a good deal of false information'.
Suggestion: much false information; a good deal of false information
...irstly, Internet data although provides many false information making a person confused with the corre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 179.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15642458101 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79121710342 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63687150838 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.3672363708 49.4020404114 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.9090909091 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118459385758 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494595780553 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820107339573 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818401091504 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743798972141 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.