Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children?
Childhood diseases nowadays can be prevented by the use of vaccines. Although parents ought to immunize their children by law And I agree, but some think that it is better to be individuals have the ability to choose not to immunize their children.
Firstly, one of the extremely major reasons to make the vaccine made by low is that some people lack the right knowledge about its benefits. Furthermore, will not consider the drawback of neglecting this important step. Secondly, If that has been done will be as an alarm in order to remind the parents about the specific time which required to be taken in. As plenty of studies shows that some vaccine is useless if not given on its time. Thirdly, can be done as a free of charge if the law makes it as a must especially in the governments’ hospitals. Thus, make the family more aware and careful to make it.
On the other hand, one of the purposes why not individually is that may the family forget or delay the time. Which will affect the wanted action from this vaccine. Like these days a lot of people get busy with life and this is a detrimental fact. Another issue that many humans cannot afford its price. For example, one of my neighbors is beggar so she ignores the vaccine for her son. But, unfortunately now he is under a life-threatening situation.
In conclusion, for a child to be vaccinated. I believe that it is the role of the government as well as the parents. Which better to be made by law.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ay the family forget or delay the time. Which will affect the wanted action from this...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the government as well as the parents. Which better to be made by law.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55639097744 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69257977912 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582706766917 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9052725697 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2941176471 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297470546965 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080268410548 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12584780714 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211820692037 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224212172183 0.056905535591 394% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.