Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
Recently, I read an article about the popularity of immunization in Kazakhstan. Some doctors state that authorities should oblige parents to protect their children through vaccination. However, some health scientists argue that they should allow them to decide on their own. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agree with the idea of independent parental choice.
Let us start with the reasons why some practitioners advocate that the government should make parents to vaccinate their children. The first reason is that it usually helps young people to avoid many diseases. Many children, for example, stay healthy throughout the breakout of deadly flu, if they receive vaccination in advance, since it teaches their organism how to identify the disguising virus and consequently eradicate it. Another reason is that it is frequently economical. Most parents do not have to buy any costly medicine to cure their children, when they are immune to a wide range of disorders via vaccination, which can save the family budget substantially. Therefore, after the analysis of these reasons, it is clear that officials should legislate the obligatory vaccination in households.
Nevertheless, some health scientists say that the government should entitle parents the right to choose whether to vaccinate their children. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, vaccination may lead to health problems in youth. The introduction of foreign substances, such as vaccine, sometimes causes many complications to the health of youngsters, because they might be either allergic to it or develop side effects. Secondly, it might be inefficient. Vaccination, for instance, cannot prevent all forms of flu, because this virus tend to adapt to new conditions and become invisible to the immunity. As a result, after the consideration of these arguments, it is obvious that parents should make a decision alone to either immunize their children or not.
In conclusion, although some doctors claim that authorities should make it obligatory for parents to immunize children, I believe that the government should let parents autonomously decide whether to do it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48967551622 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96756628368 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569321533923 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0702133196 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.388888889 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283334968448 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860356051629 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714927426959 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177153106883 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270355154709 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.