In many cities, young people prefer shopping as a form of leisure activity.Why do you think this happens?Is it a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

In many cities, young people prefer shopping as a form of leisure activity.

Why do you think this happens?

Is it a positive or negative development?

Some would argue that in many metropolitan, market visits for shopping has become a way to break monotonous routine. I think that this phenomenon has emerged because of the extremely busy life of people; however, it is an unwelcome development because it eventually leads to debts.

There are several reasons for this burgeoning trend. Firstly, lack of recreational centers in the cities such as sports grounds and other healthy amenities for the younger generation, where they can replenish themselves apart from their hectic routine. Secondly, most young masses have a packed routine, and they are unable to spare some time to schedule meet up with their friends or plan any trip to a picnic spot. So, it leads to exhaustion in many people and, they consider shopping as an activity to freshen up themselves. For example, a report of a survey conducted in the Centaurus Mall revealed that 70% of people came here for shopping to experience a change in their routine.

On the other hand, this development has several negative impacts on the life of young persons because they seek gratification in shopping; and eventually ended up wasting a hefty amount on buying unnecessary things. However, they do not realize that they waste a lot of their hard-earned money unintentionally on shopping. For instance, in Canada, the average income of a young person is $20,000, and he spends about $9000 of his income on shopping unimportant things.

To conclude, in cities, people are living a busy life where they do not have enough opportunities to get a break from their tedious routine so they consider shopping as an activity to rejoice themselves. However, it is a kind of development that needs to be discouraged because unknowingly these activities consume a huge amount of money.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, apart from, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07796610169 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8487204625 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0450391892 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163172102249 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602341516438 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332289747112 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102280249634 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122699056485 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.