The concept of compulsory military service has been adopted by numerous countries as a means of providing national defense and fostering patriotic ideals. While the idea may seem appealing at first glance, I firmly believe that extending this obligation to both men and women is not necessarily a desirable course of action.
From a practical standpoint, military service entails significant physical and mental demands that may not be appropriate for all individuals, regardless of gender. For example, individuals with physical disabilities or medical conditions may not be able to perform the necessary duties and could be placed in harm's way. Furthermore, the psychological toll of military service can be significant, particularly in combat situations, and may result in lasting trauma and emotional difficulties.
Moreover, the notion of compulsory military service undermines the principles of personal freedom and autonomy. Forcing individuals to participate in military service against their will is a violation of their individual rights and liberties. It also disregards the importance of voluntary service, which allows individuals to choose to serve their country based on their own beliefs and convictions.
Additionally, the idea of compulsory military service for women raises a number of questions and concerns regarding gender equality. For instance, women may face discrimination and unequal treatment within the military, or may be assigned duties that are not commensurate with their abilities or interests. Furthermore, the introduction of compulsory military service for women may exacerbate societal attitudes that view women as inferior or less capable than men.
In conclusion, while the idea of compulsory military service may appear to be a practical solution for national defense, it is my belief that this approach is fraught with challenges and potential negative consequences. Rather than forcing individuals to serve, it is more appropriate to promote voluntary service and encourage individuals to choose to serve their country based on their own beliefs and convictions. Ultimately, this approach will result in a more dedicated and effective military, and a more patriotic and inclusive society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75903614458 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17759521288 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527108433735 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3857552723 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.571428571 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274012687178 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102230811791 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587622152425 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157917980687 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584424856513 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.