Many countries now face an economic downturn so it is better for each country to focus on its own problems rather than helping other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
There is an on-going economic crisis across the globe and several countries are badly effected than others. Some argue that stabling one’s own economy should be prioritized instead of lending a helping hand to other countries, I disagree to this statement. In this essay, I will discuss how sharing of resources can change fortunes of a country and importance of adherence to world order, along with relevant examples to support my points.
To begin with, coexistence has come into prominence since the advent of globalization. Sharing of resources such as knowledge and artillery has become a norm with many countries benefiting along with resurrection of global economy. During economic crisis, a country cannot isolate from world and try to get the economy back on track. The trade has to be carried out with multiple countries and knowledge has to shared with others. To illustrate this, an Oxford University research states that foreign direct investments were instrumental in getting Greek economy up to 6.5% growth with FDI accounting to 20% of revenue. Therefore it is conclusively clear that countries have to mutually assist one another during any crisis.
Furthermore, most of the countries are bought under one umbrella by the UNO to avert any conflicts. There have been multiple treaties and policies signed by the nations pledging their adherence to the same. Although putting country’s own interest on fore is not against any policy, denying assistance when required is certainly not why the treaty of equal trade was signed by 200 countries. To cite an example, when there was a nuclear ttck on Japan, all the Asian countries in accordance with the treaty contributed various resources until the situation is normalized. Thus it is possible to state that no country can disregard the policy and deny aid when asked for.
To sum up, while it is advisable to focus on country’s own economy in adversity, I believe that when resources should be shared among others and a global law has to be followed to make world a better place and in turn the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
There is an on-going economic crisis across the globe and se...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[16]
Message: Did you mean 'badly affected'?
Suggestion: badly affected
...oss the globe and several countries are badly effected than others. Some argue that stabling o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... with FDI accounting to 20% of revenue. Therefore it is conclusively clear that countries...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 725, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y assist one another during any crisis. Furthermore, most of the countries are b...
^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en multiple treaties and policies signed by the nations pledging their adherence ...
^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rces until the situation is normalized. Thus it is possible to state that no country...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0612244898 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74074498216 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1857694538 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.733333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223535451784 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757650090575 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417327376706 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139066011424 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317488294652 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.