With a seemingly strong financial crunch making the way through the majority of the countries, rerouting resources towards the rejuvenation of our own country has started to look like a wise option. While exchanging the goods that an economically failing country is dominant at might benefit the upliftment, I strongly agree that a shift in focus towards the internal affairs of such countries will have more benefits.
On the one hand, continuous import and export of goods promise a healthy flow of money, especially if a country has a large production of a highly in-demand commercial good. Such trades, promise a strong source of income for the country to in turn invest them for other purposes such as education and healthcare. A recent news article emphasized that India is the third-largest exporter of a variety of rice. Profits earned through such trades are then in turn used to facilitate a huge number of surgical instruments as well as in constructing new schools.
On the other hand, investing a handsome amount of ones own reserves in the self-development process for their own country can possibly elevate various sectors of their own economy. Moreover, redirecting the annual taxes collected and equally investing in the share markets, small businesses, and into health care could motivate the citizens to work better towards a better future. Furthermore, during the pandemic, research statistics showed that hiring employees within the country of Canada, boosted the economy by twice the expected ratio.
In conclusion, many times the ruling party of a country might see the continual of trade as a benefit to their own economy and that of their counter countries, while I strongly disagree and see that rather focusing the resources and finance of a country for the benefit of their own can deliver results in vast multitudes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...velopment process for their own country can possibly elevate various sectors of their own ec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, then, third, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16943521595 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83338651798 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1700096204 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.6 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249286041239 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869910207213 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610588024394 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147762598604 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310537782349 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.