Do you think businesses should hire employees who will spend their entire lives working for the company? Explain why do you agree or disagree. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
The quality of people employed by organizations is directly proportional to the profits made. Some people argue that hiring of employees is to be done on a permanent basis, I disagree to this thought and believe that it is a not an acceptable policy to have. This essay will discuss how it leads to a substandard attitude towards work and also its impact on company’s revenue and growth along with suitable examples to support my points.
To begin with there is ample evidence indicating that firms have to replenish the workforce periodically to stay relevant. The central reason for this is that tenured workers tend to be resistant to change when a new policy is introduced which does not benefit in company’s growth as being relevant is the norm in present world. Recruiting young and new talent who are abreast with latest technological changes in the sector is a success mantra many businesses follow. To illustrate this, British Airways have offered an early and a 20% increased retirement package to staff who are closer to the retirement age to accommodate younger personnel. Therefore it is conclusively clear that in order to compete in the industry companies need to have a perfect balance of new and old employees.
In addition to this, allowing employees to work for unending time in a company leads to a laidback and rigid attitude among members of workforce towards the work. This will lead to decrease in productivity and consequently effect the revenue of an organization. For instance, if a new branch opens in a different continent, the long lasting staff could be reluctant to come out of their comfort zone and move to a new location when asked. Thus it is possible to state that the longevity of employee in an establishment will lead to a bad attitude at workplace.
To conclude, in my opinion hiring workers to last forever in a company is not advisable as it has a negative effect on revenues of a company and also could lead to a unpleasant work culture
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is the norm in present world. Recruiting young and new talent who are abreast wit...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...g young and new talent who are abreast with latest technological changes in the sector is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...t age to accommodate younger personnel. Therefore it is conclusively clear that in order ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and move to a new location when asked. Thus it is possible to state that the longev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ues of a company and also could lead to a unpleasant work culture
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84164222874 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88284859825 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.0511275869 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138019043045 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046591052185 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032075419326 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086453959681 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157786785067 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.