In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away.
What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to?
The impact of modernization can be seen in all facets of society. In this modern era, people consider that the usage of daily used products is beneficial to a limited period of time after that they should be discarded. The main reasons for this thinking are the accessibility of products at cheap and affordable rates and the availability of items in huge quantities. However, this trend can lead to an increase in environmental pollution.
To embark on, People avoid using the items more than once and prefer to throw it away because of numerous reasons. Firstly, the products used for the daily household chores or for other activities are available in the supermarkets at considerably low rates which encourage the individuals to purchase them in large quantities. Consequently, this over-consumption leads to the degradation of items after a short span of time. Secondly, another crucial reason is that manufacturers produce items in large quantities. Additionally, the principal focus of industrialists is the quantity, as a result, they compromise the quality of the product. Therefore, the durability of such items reduces which obligates the consumers to throw them away.
This phenomenon can have an extreme impact on the environment. Primarily, the products available at cheap prices are manufactured using non-biodegradable materials such as plastic which can lead to environmental pollution. Next, the trend of throwing away household items produces waste. Thus, the exaggeration of rubbish can cause soil and air pollution, that is harmful to the ecosystem. For instance, an environmental study has revealed that 40% of the rubbish produced from the household contains disposable plates and cups used in homes and in parties.
In conclusion, admittedly following the practices of modern society is quintessential to remain updated but the detrimental repercussions of such activities to our environment should also be kept in mind. In the near future, owing to the increase of environmental pollution, the throwaway practice will be banned by the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sed products is beneficial to a limited period of time after that they should be discarded. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44891640867 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28137155546 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544891640867 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5486355525 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.529411765 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143943879183 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461793586302 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351157568948 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846384498402 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324111306346 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.