In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o

In this day and age, few people with niche skillset are able to make more money than others. Their salaries are much higher to the market standards in whichever industries they are working in. While some people think that government should not encourage salaries above a benchmark, others feel that this approach is fair for the country. In my opinion, it fortifies government’s economic strength if the tax are paid in the proper way. We will discuss both the views before coming to a conclusion.

On one hand, the government should always have a standard level in the salaries of the people so that we can evade few major concerns in our country such as unbalanced salaries among the people, impractical expectation of the salary, unrealistic comparison etc. For instance, Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google earns around 50$ billion per month, eventually fresh graduates coming out of the colleges expect this kind of highly paid jobs. While he has crossed many hurdles to reach the phase, it has created false expectation about the salaries in Information Technology industry. Indeed it leads to unrealistic comparison. Hence salary must be balanced irrespective of the industry. Government should enforce set of rules and regulations to generalize the salary of the people.

On the contrary, it benefits the government in several ways. Firstly, 30% tax will be collected out of the income for all employees irrespective of their salaries. Hence, higher the pay of an employee higher the tax paid. Government can plan effectively on infrastructure developments with huge income like tax payers. Government should encourage people who earns abundantly so that more entrepreneurs will be developed in our country and this will precursor the growth of the country.

To elucidate, even though government faces few concerns on highly paid citizens, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Government earns more money and more business, apparently leading to financial stability. It is my hope that government appreciates those kind of people and give more opportunities to them.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$50'.
Suggestion: $50
...ndar Pichai, CEO of Google earns around 50$ billion per month, eventually fresh gra...
^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...ies in Information Technology industry. Indeed it leads to unrealistic comparison. Hen...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...eed it leads to unrealistic comparison. Hence salary must be balanced irrespective of...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
... is my hope that government appreciates those kind of people and give more opportunities t...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, hence, if, so, while, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31419939577 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96175455312 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574018126888 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4128660533 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5789473684 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282414248942 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075800240397 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748500232021 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164950196124 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612387189098 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.