In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?
What solutions can you suggest?
News is the part of human's life. However, in many developed countries, the number of people went digitized and started watching news on e-paper and it impacted on reduction of newspapers. Perhaps, I believe that going digitized can cause you great impact on your eyes in near future. So, to be on newspaper will be a better option.
Nowadays, people tend to lose faith from the news channels on TV because of the false stories which they are flashing for the higher TRP ratings of the individual channels. They do not tend to have any interest in flashing the true scenarios. Infect, it has been believed that they are more interested in spreading false reports to gain more TRP's then their competitors. Therefore, people are keen to move towards e-paper rather wasting their time in distorted news.
Furthermore, pertaining newspapers people tend to lose interest due to carrying. Precisely in this busy world, people keen to have less time for reading full newspaper at once and due to half-read newspaper needs to be carried along with them wherever they move. Hence, humans shifted on e-paper which is easily readable anywhere and anytime.
Anyway, still the advantages of the e-paper outweigh the disadvantages in following ways. Firstly, it will be highly impactful for the naked eye in the future perspective. Secondly, it could not be safe as lots of information from the device has been taken by the e-paper applications. Finally, sometimes there can be a chance of technical faults in it.
I put my pen down, if the news channels stop spreading wrong news then people will start looking them again. Similarly, if newspaper only shows the headlines the people can manage to read it fully and stop watching news on e-papers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97602739726 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6322475657 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8523225478 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4705882353 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19520236985 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560349727461 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044705189545 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10365493979 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464005604331 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.