In many countries, weddings are expensive as compared to the past.
It is a positive or negative development
The trend of a glamourous wedding has taken over the new generation by storm. I believe it to be a negative development not only because of its mega-disadvantages related to increasing debt and augmenting polarity in social segments, but also because of its primary flaw as becoming penny less in the future. This essay will explore how these mega-drawbacks make this development a positive one.
Firstly, fancy matrimonial ceremonies divide society into rich and poor segments. This is to say, those who spend more money are considered wealthy and reputable, while those with simple arrangements are deemed a lower class of society. Take an example of Brazil, where a significant proportion of young people wanted to show-off by arranging an expensive gathering to look rich in society. Thus, separation of society into an upper and lower class make this development a negative one.
Secondly, people run out of budget to make a lavish wedding. Since a fancy arrangement demands a hefty amount of money, people have to borrow money from banks, friends or relives ending up in debt. This fact can be better explained with an example of Germany, where the National bank has offered public a wedding loan at a 4% markup, and a large proportion is applying for the loan. Hence, pilling up the stress of debt has a negative impact on the married lives of youngsters.
Finally, the future of people who became extravagant on marriage is on stake because this money could be spent on their own betterment such as health and travel insurance. Therefore, spending all savings on a wedding day is not a wise approach, in fact, it is an unwelcome development.
To sum up, the trend of lavish weddings has a bad impact on people in terms of debenture, extending the gap between rich and poor and in the future prospect, all these mega-disadvantages make this a negative development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99683544304 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94222800886 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.516275417 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137120591272 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444683008091 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416349628507 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753493542755 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548499430503 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.