Many families move to different countries. Some people think children can benefit from this, while others consider it is hard for children if families move to a foreign country. Discuss both views and your opinion.
Migrating to another country is the ubiquitous phenomenon for families in the contemporary world. It is often argued that this can be fruitful for progeny, though others hold the different opinions. As for me, I am convinced that predisposition from homeland to other nations has a positive effects on offspring.
Those who assert moving is helpful hold the following reasons. Firstly, owing to changing territory by parents, children get the opportunity to affiliate with a new culture. Moreover, young ones can gather diverse knowledge about languages and education by transcending their boundaries, which can improve their mental horizon and expands their thinking abilities. To cite an example, one of my five-year old cousins went Dubai with her parents from India for her father’s job, she learned a new language as well as several technic of pedagogy, when she came back after four years. Secondly, offspring have to learn at very tender age their basic necessary activity, which makes them more responsible and mature early. Therefore, it has pivotal merits to children for making their future properly.
However, there are opposing voices. To commence with, migration from own territory has some inconvenience for generation, which get them far away from their culture also their kin. In addition, in double culture, they feel a differently to decide what is profitable for them. For instance, there is a vast gulf between Indian culture and culture followed in other countries, hence children can get confuse between them. Consequently, moving from own boundaries to another is detrimental to young ones.
To conclude, in my opinion, the pros of migration from own nation to another outweigh its cons, as it provide better background to progeny’s mind for their future career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun technic seems to be countable; consider using: 'several technics'.
Suggestion: several technics
..., she learned a new language as well as several technic of pedagogy, when she came back after f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35915492958 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84300406065 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661971830986 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3636226931 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.466666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211175131737 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679283097548 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03873371589 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124234842598 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491237669563 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.