Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
There is no deny that any country could reach to greater heights of success and prosperity under right governance. In addition to that economic growth should be one of the key focus areas of any good government. Some folks believe that the government which is in power has to be also held responsible for overall development in myriad of prospects not just as a monetary facilitator. In this essay we will look at the causes for both side of the arguments.
To begin with, policymakers are duly responsible for economical growth of any country. Law and regulations should be made which ease doing of small and large scale businesses. Because, a country where economy is thriving would have higher GDP and higher growth rate. As a result, the per capital income of each citizens of a country would be more and concomitant will increase the buying power of an average consumer and result in more business. Hence, having right policies by regime will act as a catalyst and be really advantageous to form a complete cycle for upward financial trajectory.
On the other hand, to focus solely on one part of entire picture is not beneficial in long run. Government should keep an eye on all around development in multifarious aspects of the country. To illustrate, infrastructure in terms of better road and train connectivity between states and cities within them, building good telecommunication services which aid various other needs. Another key point is to have proper education for all children, hygienic sanitation and cleanliness for all of its citizens. For instance, in India government has a massive program known as "Swachh Bharat" to keep your surroundings clean. Such, initiatives really drive country towards greater heights.
In conclusion, yes the government is responsible for economical growth but it is not the only area where focus is needed. On the contrary, a country really thrives to unprecedented level when overall growth in several, if not all aspects are taken care of.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
..., policymakers are duly responsible for economical growth of any country. Law and regulati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 54, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
..., yes the government is responsible for economical growth but it is not the only area wher...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, really, so, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11515151515 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95049450339 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6913915745 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2941176471 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102491640692 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337886014171 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334361343839 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637358884641 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157831351345 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.