Variant museums have highly valuable historical heritages that should be protected by every nations in order to preserve them for future generations. Therefore, paying money for visiting museums should be considered for different reasons that I will explain now.
The most important factor in considering charges for museums is its effect on economy of a country. By which I mean that there are significant international museums, absorbing a huge number of visitors during the years, leading to foreign money exchanges to a state. This causes tourism industry boosts rapidly and helps for improving and developing more facilities for tourists. Furthermore, protecting cultural and historical inheritances in both national and international museums is a fundamental issue which dedicating budgets for these kinds of nation revenues is necessary. Admittedly, preserving them needs excessive funds, therefore, charges for museums entrances can be considered as a part of protection costs.
Furthermore, some people believe in no charges for museums, thinking that unaffordable families need to learn about museums too. But thanks to technology, remote viewing of the museums is prepared as real as possible, leading to other nations, disabled people and poor families to access museums virtually. Therefore, in order to run such facilities and protect museums properly and help a nation’s economic prospects, considering charges should be a compulsory. Of course, for special groups such as students and elderly people some offers such as discounts or free visits in special days are considered to encourage them to be more familiar with their state’s histories and cultures by museum authorities.
To sum up, charges for museums should be considered in order to protect them and help for economy boost, and for special groups of societies some facilities are considered, ranging from virtual museum tours to discount and free visits in some days.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch dedicating budgets for these kinds of nation revenues is necessary. Admittedly...
^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r museums entrances can be considered as a part of protection costs. Furthermore...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...museums should be considered in order to protect them and help for economy boost,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, i mean, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56211180124 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93838879298 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5453269746 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.928571429 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50477667793 0.244688304435 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232691963512 0.084324248473 276% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.22938667908 0.0667982634062 343% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382592217083 0.151304729494 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.310568536957 0.056905535591 546% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.