It is often debated whether museums should be free for public or visitors should pay fees. While there are some drawbacks associated with charging for admission, I believe its main benefits are more substantial.
When talking about museums most people immediately think of a boring place where a set of historical artifacts with tones of description that anyone never read them are on display. For most individuals, it is the least favorite place to go. In my opinion, the reason lay behind its free entrance fee since they are unable to improve their conditions to make it more appealing for juveniles and other groups of society.
In other word, by the money they receive from visitors they could recruit a lot of creative and illegible staff to make up their mind to turn it to more attractive place. Furthermore, a lot of recreational and educational facilities could be provided for school children in a way they could learn historical events while playing. By the right investment of museum’s income it could eventually be a main source of income for the government and it could even be a main tourist attraction like the Louver museum which attract thousands of visitors all around the word.
In conclusion, by charging people, museums would be able to flourish and function well and develop the tourism industry as well. So the benefits of this phenomenon outweigh its disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, talking about, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02145922747 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77542070396 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622317596567 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0877989939 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241377551056 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894654226054 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391266748689 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14569946476 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451873179386 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.