Museums plays an important role for educating citizens, and many of them were free for everyone in past decades. However, more and more museums try to charge visitors for some reasons. In my views, I believe that admission to museums with some charging has more benefits than for free.
There are two main reasons why it could be argued that museums should charge form people who wants to visit and should not be free. Firstly, money is needed for maintaining museum services, such as fee of electricity and paid for hiring stuff. However, it is not enough for continuing the survives of museums only by the budget form the government. Therefore, museum should try to get more money by charging visitors. Secondly, user should pay for what they want. These means that you need to pay for going into the museum and learning some knowledge inside.
However, I would agree with the idea that visitors should not be charged for admission to museums. For the education purpose of the museums, this is the place that provided some extra knowledge that we can not learn from schools. If you have to pay for the admission, it is not fair to someone without money who really want to visit the museum and learn something new. Besides, people would have more willing to visit museums if it is all for free. As the results, the level of education of whole country could be elevated.
In conclusion, I totally disagree with the idea that people who want to visit museum should pay for the admission to museum. In contrast, I believe the government should be responsible for all fee for continuing museums services.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78136200717 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40581636133 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494623655914 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2573473221 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.375 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420023871111 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165738502426 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779389492621 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307187300667 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448487187087 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.