Many parents complain about violence promoted to their children through video games, TV programs and other media. Why is it happening? What can be the solution for it?
Nowadays, media such as computer games and TV shows are so popular among young children. Their parents, however, contend that violence and destructive behavior shown in these programs are harmful. There are specific root causes behind this negative development, and effective policies can be adopted to remedy the situation.
There exist a number of reasons why these video games and TV shows entail violence. First and foremost, acts of crime and violence may pique many children’s interests. In fact, spending most of their time on school and its assignments, these students would be tiresome, and in turn, they would look for something more exhilarating than everyday activities. This is where the mentioned media plays its role to entertain the users. Secondly, apart from being attractive to youngsters, these games and shows might not have been created for children in the first place. Thus, parents have every right to be worried about the contents of TV and computer productions prompted to their children.
There are, however, some workable solutions to cope with this phenomenon. One step would be producing attractive games and shows specifically for the younger users, particularly the ones that do not encompass any act of violence and nudity. Video games that their contents have been checked by various filter units in order to be suitable for younger ages are the most salient illustrations. Another viable alternative is to create reliable labeling systems for the media mainstreams by legislators. To explain more, it is much better to differentiate all the programs and games by the age groups of their target audience. This could directly lead to fewer children being prone to detrimental scenes.
In conclusion, owing to the fact that manifold aspects of children’s characteristics are negatively affected by the violent scenes that existed in media, lawmakers can tackle the problem through controlling the contents and separating them for distinct age groups.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3642172524 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80238501597 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610223642173 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6311394187 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360704300132 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102532122792 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425701512485 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198293962322 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538168539578 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.