Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.
To what extent do you agree?
While there is a contradiction being a part of social sites creates disharmony among people, helps to keep individual connected at every aspect of life. To be very precise, I completely disagree with this opinion and think that social sites has given the platform for many people to become famous and helped in staying connected people.
First of all, it has been observed that with the advancement of technology it is now becoming easier to explore talent. Social sites not only gives platform for talent but also has given solution for difficult problems. With the tremendous growth in digital media different sites has made common people popular and has been taken up to the celebrity level. Across different webpages there are few very famous. For example, social site known as tik tok though banned has made individual so successful that they have started earning their bread and butter out of it. Thus, networking sites are now acting as boon for showcasing the charisma.
More importantly, earlier it was seen parents were not able to see their kids staying in foreign countries instead they can now with the help of video calling. Although features like video calling has impacted the age group between13-30 but has also helped to talk to loved ones. Due to different networking applications it has now become easy to connect for jobs as well. For instance, site known as linkdin not only help to unite for job but also given the opportunity to advertise. That is why interference of people on common site plays a vital role in today’s competitive world.
To conclude, I would rather say public network is as important as food to live. Without public platform competition in terms of jobs, expertise will remain silent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98281786942 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56848428312 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5037400221 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139236080818 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461995838411 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361178807736 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080692867454 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401154272903 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.