Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Social network, a widely known as the future of nations communication, is a heated-up subject. It is believed that the detrimental impacts of social websites are severe on people as well as nation. I partially agree with this notion, as there are positive outcomes of using such interfaces. This essay will discuss, firstly, the negative results out of this, and secondly, some advantages of those websites, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, advanced technology plays a pivotal role in human life, and social networks are part of this revolution. However, people, who are exposed frequently to such websites, are being more likely suffered from mental diseases and problems with others. They lose the links with actual world around them and be so attached to their own online world. For instance, an undertaken survey by a prestigious university in United Kingdom published that 90% of new generation have phycological issues due to their long attendance to the social websites. In addition, they lose the family ties because of spending their whole time on such gadgets.
On the contrary, current development of such websites and its new features have a positive impact on the world. It makes people from all over the world to get in touch while staying in their homes in different countries. There is an expression comes from such technology as “World becomes a small village”. For example, I can get in touch with my foreign friends in their country by using such new applications in those social networks. It is one of the big advantages not only to ordinary people, but also at governmental level of communication.
To sum up, it is undeniable that social networks have a deterioration impact on individual, but on another aspect, some advantages are measured from such technology. It won`t be a concern if governments set some regulation on its usage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13225806452 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93952398335 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7133292521 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1668728077 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562795217388 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500953495349 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107026066791 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320181641158 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.