Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Others think it is a disadvantage for them. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Whilst some members of the society underscore the importance of the technological advancement for increasing working standard of employees on their work place, however others advocates that introducing these technologies have no convenience to workers. There are rational arguments on both views of this contentious top which will be discussed in details followed by my opinion.
In old days everything was manuel and workers have to struggle a lot to complete their office tasks, but it is evident that modern technology has made employee's life easier by providing advance computers, smartphones and many other new technological gadgets. In this modern era everything is digitalised and nobody nolonger required to spend hours and hours to complete their jobs. As an example, accountants have Microsoft Excel which help them to perform advance calculations in split of a second. Therefore, with the help of technology employees have been able to perfom work wiht a higer accuracy and efficiency.
However, on the flipside of this, technology has made user more monotonus and less creative. It has taken out the thinking capability of the employee who obsessed with technology and will not work thier own initiative and their skills will buried under the skin. For an instant, the very moment employees stranded without computers and softwares they are in a deep trouble and find no-way out due their higher dependancy on machines.
In, my opinion, morden techonology has invade people's lives too much. As result, workers are unable to keep their work and familiy life in balance which has caused lot familiy issues. Work from home concept which enable employee to perfom job function from home, instead of providing benefits it has caused inefficiencies such as a distractions to work and low quality work output.
In conclusion, there are valid arguments on both sides of the controversy; on balance, it is my firm conviction that undoubtedly, improved technology has provided immense benefits to the working society and It is just the matter of the way how someone utilize it for the betterment of their working lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... while staying with their beloved ones. Therefore poeple get more opportunities and time ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'ended'.
Suggestion: ended
...r attention on their child and they had end up in unfortunate situations. In my ...
^^^
Line 5, column 558, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'ended'.
Suggestion: ended
...r attention on their child and they had end up in unfortunate situations. In my ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64430401996 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615625 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9580578153 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941301291988 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302988825108 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393048178926 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062529171791 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602197804387 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.