Many people go to university for academic study. More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this era of education, the majority of students are just attending academic courses instead of vocational ones due to unawareness. It is argued that more number of youth should be motivated to pursue professional training rather than attending the theoretical driven Institutes. I totally agree with the former view and the following paragraphs will substantiate the same.
Students should be diverted for practical knowledge as these practical skills are required because of two major reasons. Firstly, at the time of construction of infrastructure or building of architecture, it is essential. For example, when an apartment is constructed then skilled plumbers, electricians, etc are required to construct the same in better quality. Moreover, the more number of college pass-out graduates are unemployed as there is less demand for those knowledge-driven candidates in proportion to their supply.
More number of youngsters should be inspired to join practical classes as educational driven institutes are just focusing on exam driven curriculum. Schools should focus more on providing practical workshops instead of just shaping the minds of pupils with information. For example, nowadays, many premier colleges are not only focusing on theoretical knowledge but also on practical knowledge. Parents may also divert the minds of their children towards professional knowledge ultimately these persons will play a vital role in the better future of society.
In Conclusion, more number of pupils should be inspired to take practical courses as their profession which will not only lessen the unemployment from society but also will provide great infrastructural facilities to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rastructural facilities to the society.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69019607843 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14304857189 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1638210197 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.916666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122491477871 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467694507452 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300533631523 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771884956544 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192696971923 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.