Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. what are the reasons? Is this a positive or negative development?
Spending cash instead of hoarding is favored by innumerable individuals because this assists them in fulfilling their desires resulting in happiness. In my opinion, this is a negative development which can lead to irreversible consequences in near future.
The major reason for spending cash is for the fulfilment of an individual’s needs, dreams and ambitions which resultantly provides a sense of happiness, satisfaction and also fills their life with cherish able memories.
In terms of positive aspects, firstly, utilizing savings or capital money instead of hoarding leads an individual to live and enjoy their life to the fullest ultimately resulting in experiences and vast knowledge in different sectors of life. Secondly, these individuals do not have any regrets in future life because they follow their heart and utilize each opportunity thrown towards them by life in a positive way.
Despite advantages, there are enormous disadvantages because people who do not conserve cash and only focus on squandering resultantly end up empty handed. Such individuals do not effectively plan for their future needs, hence having no cash or savings in any emergency or critical situation. Thereby, asking others for help in the hour of need. Moreover, these individuals depict irresponsible and non-serious attitude which might cost them their future relationships, career or even life in a few circumstances.
In conclusion, innumerable individuals spend their cash for fulfilling or following their dreams and ambitions which gives them a sense of happiness and satisfaction in life but squandering money instead of saving can cause individuals to be helpless in the hour of need and have disastrous effects on their personal and professional lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...opportunity thrown towards them by life in a positive way. Despite advantages, there are enorm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56296296296 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16081113376 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3673669435 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120829241282 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052063861796 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399887645122 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756741548065 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386066600223 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.