Many people in these days get goods and service immediately. Why this happen? And whether it is positive and negative development?
Due to technology revolution in various industries people at present get quick service when compared to a decade ago. However, still some government sectors are yet to implement the latest software, which have caused considerable delay over the years. In the following passage, I will explain the factors as well as pros of this change before declaring my stance.
Nowadays, online shopping is becoming the talk of the town and attained great popularity all over the world, which helps people to buy products and get delivered instantly. Advanced tracking systems are used to pack and deliver the product in short span of time. For instance, I bought a blazer to attend an important function in few days. The parcel reached my home next days and this due to improved courier service. Furthermore, in some government sectors such as; revenue department and registration department people can quickly obtain their legal certificates instantly, because of the latest software. Thus, it is believed, the improved quality of service helps people to save cost and time to a great extent which is a positive sign.
Moreover, the mobile revolution aids people to get the latest news quickly, which were not the case few decades ago, where people totally rely on news television channels and radio stations. For example, when Tusnami attacked Indonesia’s costal region in 2004, the India government acted quickly and saved hundreds of people. On the other side, at the moment, some rumours are posted in social media websites create havoc among the citizens. Hence, it is assumed, new technology has evolved for people to access the latest information instantly, which is always a good sign for the country.
To conclude, even though apart from few negative incidents occurred due to false information from social media websites, but considering the improved quality of service in goods and services sector, it is recommended to be a positive development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2126984127 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72667551888 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615873015873 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1599371308 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169536934858 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511044709837 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465975799199 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102366627243 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230744057149 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.