MANY PEOPLE LIKE TO WEAR FASHIONABLE CLOTHS.
WHY DO YOU THINK THIS IS THE CASE ?
IS THIS A GOOD THING OR A BAD THING ?
THE TENDANCY TO CLOTH YOURSELF IN TRENDY OUT FITS IS A COMMON FASHION NOWADAYS. TO MY KNOWLEDGE IT IS A PHYCOLOGICAL FACTOR WHICH HAS A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE SOCIETY. FURTHER TO EXPLAIN IT IS QUITE APPARENT THAT MOST OF THE YOUNG PEOPLE CHOOSE TO WEAR FASHIONBLE CLOTHS JUST SIMPLY TO SHOW OFF THAT HE IS A KID WHO IS MODERN. THEY FEEL CLOTHS WITH LOT OF GADGETS AND WHICH ARE SIMILAR TO WHAT OTHERS WEAR IS GOING TO MAKE OR PROJECT HIM AS A IMPORTANT PERSON. LITTLE KNOWING THAT A DECENT DRESS WILL PROJECT HIM TO A GENTLEMAN STATUS. MORE OVER, THE BAD EFFECT IT WILL CAST IN THE SOCIETY IS ALSO HUGE. WE ALL KNOW FASHION COST MONEY AND A REGULAR PERSON WITH A LOW INCOME MIGHT FIND IT DIFFICULT TO KEEP UP WITH THE PACE. HE MAY FEEL HE WOULD BE REJECTED FOR NOT BEING UP DATED. APART FROM THAT IT WILL ALSO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO SPEND MORE MONEY ON DRESSERS NEGLECTING FACTORS LIKE SAVING AND SPENDING ON KNOWLEDGE RELATED MATTERS. NEVERTHELESS, THE PEOPLE WILL FORCE THEMSELF TO FASIONABLE IN OUTER APPEARENCE FORGETTING HOW YOU SHOULD DEVELOP YOUR INNER SELF. MOST YOUNG PEOPLE TEND TO THINK A FLASY DRESS IS GOING TO GET HIM EVERYTHING FROM FOOD, JOB AND SPECIALLY GIRLS. BUT NOT A HONEST, THUSTWORTHY, DECENT GUY WITH A BIG HEART. IN CONCLUSION IT SHOULD BE STATED THE THE IDEALOGY OF BEING A NEW KID IN THE BLOCK IS A MEAR WRONG THINKING AND MAY CAST VERY BAD EFFECTS IN SOCIETY.
- Some people say that tourists cannot learn very much about a place from visiting it on holiday Others say that they can learn a lot Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Children s friends are an important part of their lives What kinds of influence may children s friends have on them What is the best way for parents to make sure that their children s friends are a good influence on them 33
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only for their own heath but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your opinion. 89
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The table information of London 2012 Olympic Games medals tables for top 10 countries is shown. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: FURTHER,
...H HAS A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE SOCIETY. FURTHER TO EXPLAIN IT IS QUITE APPARENT THAT MO...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1271, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: THE
...EART. IN CONCLUSION IT SHOULD BE STATED THE THE IDEALOGY OF BEING A NEW KID IN THE BLOC...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1271, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'THE' or 'THE' is left.
Suggestion: THE; THE
...EART. IN CONCLUSION IT SHOULD BE STATED THE THE IDEALOGY OF BEING A NEW KID IN THE BLOC...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45098039216 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42429076181 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4998124839 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3076923077 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101084277873 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310351848598 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229909949205 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101084277873 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 12.4159519038 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.