Nowadays, an increase in urban population has led to shrinkage of residential land which has attributed to scarcity of homes. Thereby, to tackle the increasing demand of homes, land in rural areas is being exploited to provide for housing. Some people believe we need to safeguard the countryside and my opinion subsides with this thought.
To embark upon, the land in countryside which is being used for creating dwelling places for urban people is agriculture land. As a matter of fact, usage of this fertile land has a negative impact on farmers because they do not possess any other profession or skill out of which they can make an earning. Moreover, paucity of agricultural land is directly proportional to under production of food. This means the prices of food items will be increased and under-privileged people will not be able to afford them.
In continuity, another impact of using rural land for housing projects can be seen on flora and fauna. It has been observed that places in countryside are rich in plants and other living beings. Therefore, disturbing the natural habitat of such species will endanger them and can even lead to their extinction.
On the contrary, building tower based homes called apartments should be taken up in urban areas on whatever land that is left. The government should discourage building of independent housing in large cities. As a result, the land can be used for accommodating more families by creating towers of flats.
In the end, land preservation in countryside should be the prime agenda for any government as this will help in protecting the local community and the ecosystem of the place. On the other hand, constructing smart homes that can accommodate a large number of people on small piece of urban land is the need of the hour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, an increase in urban population has led to shrinkage...
^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ucting smart homes that can accommodate a large number of people on small piece of urban land is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, therefore, well, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9701986755 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78056789639 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55298013245 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6289703029 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132250482585 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492176261429 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039586755411 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810667230927 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271437638231 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.