Many schools believe that it is beneficial to provide junk food in schools. Do you think it is a negative or a positive development?
In the modern age, junk food has spread widely among schools canteens. While some managers believe that it profits the school financially, others have a diverse view. I am of the belief that it is a negative development and has dangerous consequences. This essay will manifest the downsides of unhealthy food and its impact on offspring’s health.
To begin with, children spend long hours in schools; and they get probably two main meals during study hours. Therefore, if burgers, pizzas and fizzy drinks are the choices that have in the school canteen, this will lead to serious health issues. This is exemplified at several forms of diseases such as obesity, high blood pressure and diabetes. This can be witnessed in The US, where we can find 60 per cent of youth suffer from obesity. Hence, providing unhealthy meals to the students might be a healthy bullet.
In addition to that, not only junk food does kill activism, but it also replaces it with slacktivism. In other words, children and teenagers are suppose to get a balanced diet to keep their energy; help them to keep their fitness. This can be further explained at research that has been conducted by the school of medicine, Harvard University, shows that unhealthy school meals may leave long negative health issues to the new generations. Therefore, school managements should focus on students’ interest instead of the profits.
In conclusion, the downsides of junk food make it a killing machine for the new generations because it vanishes their powers and may lead to serious health issues. I believe that it is a negative development; it is recommended that governments should launch awareness campaigns in order to reduce the spreading of unhealthy food, and restrict laws to prevent it from schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...other words, children and teenagers are suppose to get a balanced diet to keep their en...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7241564337 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605442176871 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9726528026 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221886893932 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715749519635 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583921220145 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141847521079 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748269291159 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.