Nowadays, celebrities earn more money than politicians.. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or a negative development?
Influencers are famous figures who have an influential role in their society. In the modern era, it is argued that celebrities get more funds than political people. I am of the view that it has a detrimental impact on society. This essay first will look to the reasons for this, and then discuss why it is a negative development.
To begin with, nowadays, social media applications have become a salient feature. Not only has it a widespread but also it is cheaper to catch it. Therefore, if owners and producers wanted to announce for their products, they would ask celebrities to do that; they give them money. According to a survey has been done by The Economist showed that the annual income of Influencers at social media is more than Teachers, Doctors and politicians. Having given this example, it is suggested that Officials should impose restrictions to tackle this issue.
One main negative consequence of this problem is that it is an effect on the morals and the values of society. As an illustration, it has a negative effect on a future generation because they start to imitate them. some adult starts to believe that working in social media application such as Facebook and Snapchat It worth than education; they will get more money faster and by easy way. For Instance, an article has been published by The New York time showed that most of Youth wanted to be influencers at social media instead to be Engineers.
It can be concluded that the power of social media has shifted the balance from the hands of a few to the masses; Therefore, Famous figures have become an integral part of people’s lives. Hence, they earn more money than others which harms values and traditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ion because they start to imitate them. some adult starts to believe that working in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...cation such as Facebook and Snapchat It worth than education; they will get more mone...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t social media instead to be Engineers. It can be concluded that the power of so...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, so, then, therefore, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8156996587 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67661667252 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563139931741 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9185838092 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224233627017 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707080781155 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689214122099 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139345112269 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387804332182 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.