Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.
Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Home appliances have significantly evolved to what they were a couple of years back. Machines that were semi automatic are now evolved to fully automatic. These gadgets are the virtual hand of many homemakers in today's homes. In this essay, we will discuss the positive and negative aspects of these appliances in our homes.
It is evident and true and these appliances have reduced the household task that were fulfilled using hands years back. With introduction of washing machine, dishwasher and vacuum cleaner, the majority of tasks are significantly easier than before.For instance, a homemaker can wash cloths, wash dishes and vacuum the house simultaneously and can save time by multitasking. These machines aid people to save time, and they can indulge in some other activities. Besides, saving time these machines completed the task more efficiently than humans who used to complete the work with hands.
A major negative aspect of these machines taking over the control of our house chores is that it's making most of the people unhealthy and lazy. Since 80% of these tasks are automated and taken care by these appliances, we become lazy. For instance, before these machines arrived most of the tasks were done by people, and they used to be physically active while accomplishing these works. Therefore, now since most of the jobs are taken care by these machines, homemakers sit ideal and become unhealthy and lazy.
In conclusion, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, and I agree that machines have helped make the household task to be accomplished easier and efficiently than what people used to achieve with their hands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ks are significantly easier than before.For instance, a homemaker can wash cloths, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1872659176 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72809358976 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520599250936 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9281079898 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121340755922 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457542967101 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404157632848 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764538517203 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215039709063 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.