Many things that used to be done in the homes by hand are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Most of the household chores that were frequently done by human effort have now been overtaken by robots. Although this has some minor drawbacks, it can make work faster and create time for other professional engagements. These will be examined in the subsequent paragraphs.
On the one hand, employing robotics in domestic tasks can encourage a sedentary lifestyle which can be detrimental to the health. In other words, using artificial intelligence in carrying out these jobs make people lazy and stay in bed longer than it is required. Also, it causes home accidents due to machine failures or malfunctioning. However, this can be remedied by carrying out periodic checks and routine maintenance on the machines. For instance, the world’s most famous athlete, Williams Chioma was forced to an early career retirement due to a leg injury sustained while using an electric washing machine at home.
On the other hand, there are numerous benefits of using machines at home. The most probable merit of this is that it aids speedy accomplishment of tasks. Technology driven appliances are programmed to work with less supervision within a very short period of time. This is exemplified by the recently launched Samsung dish washer that has the ability to pick and wash dishes within split seconds. More so, with the advent of robotics in homes, people now give more attention to their occupation and it creates room for career development and efficiency in workplace. With the numerous works at home, it was observed by Robert Gordon Institute of Technology that many staff return daily to work looking pale and exhausted.
To conclude, even though advancement in technology has made house chores to be done by robots rather than human hands, the benefits of using it outweighs the demerits because it enables quicker results and affords time for career pursuit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th less supervision within a very short period of time. This is exemplified by the recently la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to time'
Suggestion: to time
... it enables quicker results and affords time for career pursuit.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so, while, as for, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14144736842 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74969897307 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0637392857 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253496429921 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740079504578 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453498679671 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135832715328 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01328041798 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.