In the past, people had been doing all of their household work manually on the contrary since the technical revolution has arrived the usage of machines at home has significantly increased. This essay will highlight that this is certainly advantageous despite few inevitable drawbacks.
To start with, about 50 years ago people were generally relying on their own to accomplish a particular task at home. However, it was difficult but thishelped previous people to keep their muscles strong. Furthermore, regular work had been enormously helping individuals to stay disease-free due to the fact that their unwanted body sweat was being released on a daily basis. Moreover, self-reliance had incredibly helped them to be more energetic and in maintaining their physical fitness. However, this had an adverse side that excessive work mostly led to muscle fatigue.
On the other hand, the importance of modern machinery is undeniable. There are numerous positives of having the latest household apparatus at home the first and foremost, it is efficient as well as productive, these machines are capable of doing abundant tasks without taking any break. Secondly, cutting edge equipment have turned human into multitasking personality due to its automatic features like these days washing machines has an auto timer which allows humans to continue other work meanwhile it is doing its work. Lastly, it is less time-consuming, for example, a vacuum cleaner at home can clean several square feet of carpet within a short time period whereas, a manual method may take more than few hours. While this has a number of deteriorating sides, over dependency on these gadgets, can turn humans more lethargic as well arise various health problems such as obesity.
To recapitulate, modern machines have been greatly contributing for people, but over-dependency can bring detrimental effects on their physic as well can put more economic burden as these types of equipment run on electrical energy
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, for example, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34394904459 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88894757551 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656050955414 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7053318632 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.076923077 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4615384615 7.06120827912 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136689370039 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474923706614 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267791676491 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803186242905 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145577459429 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.