The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas.
There is no denying fact that nowadays mass media plays influential role in individual's life. People believe what they hear and see, and this leads to so many repercussions. With proper consideration of this fact I would like to explicate my views in coming paragraph.
To embark on, there are multiple reasons that contributes to this notion. Firstly, the way news channels presents news, it is loosing its authenticity. In spite of delivering actual facts they try to manipulate their audience. Also, people don't use their own sensibility to judge anything. They just start considering everything true whatever they see. Media transforms leaders image and portraits them in such manner that, people cast their vote on the basis of that image only. Which can never be beneficial in the favour of country. Additionally, Media shows celebrities in jazzy manner which brainwashes teenagers at many extent. Teenagers wants to be like them without knowing the actual reality that is the extremely influential part.
However, apart from misleading people media is the only option people rely on for news. In my opinion, with proper rule and regulations over media this issue can be resolved. There should be a regulation of law regarding the way they telecast news. Also, people should not get affected with everything they watch. A neutral attitude in teams of news is necessitated. Furthermore, always use your own judgement to make decision. People should restrain themselves from getting brainwashed.
In my conclusion, I agree with the notion that media has that ability to transform any individual's mind. However, your own intelligence can play deceive role to choose what is right or wrong.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'facts'.
Suggestion: facts
...ts authenticity. In spite of delivering actual facts they try to manipulate their audience. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...manipulate their audience. Also, people dont use their own sensibility to judge anyt...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r vote on the basis of that image only. Which can never be beneficial in the favour o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun extent seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extent', 'a good deal of extent'.
Suggestion: much extent; a good deal of extent
...y manner which brainwashes teenagers at many extent. Teenagers wants to be like them withou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, then, apart from, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24175824176 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81940894625 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.8164544194 49.4020404114 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.1428571429 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107460542599 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306811241011 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376586714241 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652487687422 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240454183449 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.22 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.