Modern appliances in the home have become more common, leaving no doubt that advances in technology have improved our lifestyle.
We started living in a cave, as the history suggests, and thanks to the novelty and advancement of modern technology that we now live in a grand apartment with many facilities which were unimaginable even a century ago. From an uncertain life where our ancestors had to deal with constant fears of darkness and lurking predators, we have a remarkably comfortable and advanced lifestyle and this has all been possible due to the innovation in technology.
It is often argued by many that modern technology has given us comfort but has cost us dearly. As an example, they point out that we have become less active and more dependent on machines, especially on the household appliances. According to them, this is a backwards step and apparatuses cannot improve our lifestyle. What they fail to realise is that the blessing of science has eradicated many deadly diseases that had often wiped out cities and made us vulnerable like ants in the water. Advancement in technology is not a one-dimensional straight line, it is a spark of light and without it, we would still be at the mercy of natural calamities. People may blame science for the contamination of food or the advent of fast food, but it is worth mentioning that without science, we would have a world war for the food crisis.
The household appliances like washing machines and vacuum cleaners have reduced the manual labour of cleaning while rice cookers, microwave ovens, coffee makers and electric kettles have improved the way we cook at home. We no longer need to end our day when the sun sets as electric bulbs illuminate the world. Thus it might be easy to criticise the innovation and wonder the science has brought to our life but living without them is utterly impossible. For instance, imagine what the world would be without the electricity, refrigerators, TVs and the internet. Unimaginable even for a day.
To conclude, it is undeniably true that modern household appliances have made our tasks easier, faster and more accurate. With this, we have a better lifestyle and more time to spend with our family members or to enjoy our leisure activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | javerriaawan | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that there is a reduction in air travel in the future. Do you think this trend as positive or negative development? 73
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. 61
- There was a time when people only shopped out of necessity but these days shopping seems to have become a new form of leisure activity. People do not appreciate the value of money anymore.To what extent do you agree with this view? 67
- Nowadays on-line shopping has become more popular than in-store shopping. Is it a positive or a negative development? 89
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...as electric bulbs illuminate the world. Thus it might be easy to criticise the innov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, still, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91135734072 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78805251988 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562326869806 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2264027034 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285216140271 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857385729312 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681482919314 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173109965891 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506994299694 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.