Modern buildings change the character and appearance of towns and cities. The government should insist that new buildings be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that governments should protect cultural heritage. According to, some people are of the view that there should be an obligation to construct new buildings based on traditional style. It seems to me that it is not logical and this essay will provide evidence as to why new buildings are more beneficial.
There are several reasons made people avoid building their houses like the past form. First and foremost, new materials provide many benefits in terms of quality and quantity. For example, new buildings are made by a little amount of cement are stronger in comparison with the old building are needed a large amount of adobe. Secondly, educating in the construction field and raising awareness help engineers to reduce the effect of dangers phenomena like earthquakes on buildings. It leads apartments and houses to become more safe and convenient for living. Finally, nowadays, people have a tendency to have modern-designed houses. Indeed, the new style of buildings gives them an opportunity to experience the new lease of life. As a result, to be modern not only is residential area high-standard but also people feel appealing inside there.
While it may be correct to say that modern buildings would cause disappear the traditional architecture, it should be considered that the strength of houses is far more superior.
Overall, it can be said that although the government should preserve the cultural values, it is not reasonable to follow the poor structure of the traditional style. I completely disagree with this idea because new buildings are far better than the old ones in terms of aesthetics and stability.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86439850882 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8372308466 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309777013298 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994029734016 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690933031733 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202210006707 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454595566109 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.