Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past. What are the main reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development?
Unlike bygone days, the connection in contemporary customs and cultural background can be seen globally, and the prime reason for this development is globalization. While this trend has contributed favourably towards the nation's economy and businesses, there are a few downsides as well.
The world has become a global village, and the progression in communication, transportation and public industries has paved the way for foreign tourism massively. Having mentioned that in order to make the local conditions and atmosphere more welcoming to visitors, many countries are blending diverse traditions that include dancing, music and food, with their native cultural affairs. This approach is a powerful technique to tantalize worldwide tourists, which in-turn forms several employment opportunities for local people. For instance, in Thailand, there are myriad of multi-cuisine restaurants and cultural exhibits symbolizing distinct cultural history, charms thousands of people from distinctive countries each year.
On the flip-side, it appears that in the race of globalization, people are neglecting their own heritage and beliefs. As a result, many native languages and customs are on the surge of extinction. Even the new generation is entirely detached from the inheritance roots and legacy. To cite an example, In India, the influence of western culture and lifestyle is quite visible, and speaking English has become a symbol of literacy level. Not to mention that several nations are losing their historical significance and prominent events.
To conclude, the fusion of traditions and aesthetic pursuits is an outcome of internationalization, which has a prominent contribution in boosting the economy of the manifold nations. Not only this but also, cultural similarity summoned people from faraway places together and share their beliefs independently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... has contributed favourably towards the nations economy and businesses, there are a few...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8152173913 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21102606744 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2162648484 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150358088307 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423406117831 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455437218977 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796312678625 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398720032698 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.