In some cultures old people are valued more, while in other cultures youth is considered more valuable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
When comparing diverse cultures, it is often observed that people are valued according to their age group. While older people get more attention in some cultures, in others, the young generation matters a lot. In my opinion, both the generations contribute equally to society, and discriminating them based on their age is highly unethical.
On the one hand, where youngsters are considered to be an indispensable part of the society and over-valued, this is because of many reasons. Firstly, being young means lots of energy, which in turn makes them productive in the workplace. Therefore, they have a higher contribution to the nation's economy. Furthermore, when it comes to technology modern youths are bright and smart, adaptive to any change, and they are receptive. For instance, in the contemporary era, alteration at the workplace due to technological advancements can only be handled by the young generation. Thus, many regions give them more worth in comparison to elder people.
On the other hand, adoring and respecting elders is considered as a duty in numerous traditions. undoubtedly, older people have life-long experience of everything, be it work, money and other life skills. So, many people look upon there elders for empirical suggestions and guidance for their future. Not only this but senior citizens are the source of traditional values and customs which they pass on to the next generation. To exemplify, children learn ethical values and sacraments from their grandparents.
In conclusion, after hashing out both the point of view, it can be seen vividly that both the generations have their own merits and carry equal benefits to the society and nation as a whole. Hence, should be admired unprejudiced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nerations contribute equally to society, and discriminating them based on their a...
^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... they have a higher contribution to the nations economy. Furthermore, when it comes to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Undoubtedly
...dered as a duty in numerous traditions. undoubtedly, older people have life-long experience...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28776978417 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9736085325 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8895019132 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168021291009 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475703793575 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447531706377 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943825984729 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413247056516 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.