Some people believe that technology has made man more social and others think that it has made him less social. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is believed by many that people, these days, have become more socially active as a result of technological advancements. However, others and i believe that this evolution has paved the way for the anti-social community for various reasons.
First of all, as per many experts, online social media tools have provided a platform for numerous individuals to connect with others virtually and share their ideas and thoughts. Having mentioned that through these virtual communities, people from different places can get in touch with each other. Not only this, but also they can make video calls and share enormous content with not much of a hassle. Furthermore, social media has made it effortless to post and share happy moments such as marriage & birthday with friends and family. Moreover, there are several online applications that allow people to publish their views on critical social issues to disseminate awareness. For instance, Twitter, an online social platform, acting as a discussion hub for a myriad of grave national and international topics.
Critics, on the flip-side, argue that these breakthrough developments have escalated the level of isolation amongst the youth these days, and interpersonal communication has become a thing of the past. This is because people are stuck with these online communities and neglected the fact that they are rather leading a sedentary lifestyle by ignoring physical interaction. Not to mention, virtual friends are the fair-weather ones. When it comes to mental support and advice, a real camaraderie is required. Further, it has been witnessed that people who are highly active on social sites are ones, suffering from critical depression and health issues. In modern days, a large portion of the population is struggling with several lethal diseases and mental illness, are the ideal example of such virtual communications.
To conclude, although technological breakthroughs such as world-wide-web and mobile phones have enabled the new ways of social interaction, however, in my opinion, it made individuals vulnerable to the many threats as well as promoted a sluggish lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...gical advancements. However, others and i believe that this evolution has paved t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5015015015 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96040570467 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5383354077 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208130119786 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652690775557 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568414898105 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133299013027 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557117597575 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.