Modern cultures around the world have become similar when compared to the past. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative development?
The world has certainly become a global village in the recent past. Associations in the cultures across the globe are evident, which did not exist in the past. these common traits in modern cultures are the outcome of two prime factors. The essay will discuss these two main factors contributing to this trend and why this development appears to be positive.
Globalization, perhaps, is the major cause of this cultural fusion. Immigration laws now are lenient than they were ever before, and this allows the masses to relocate to countries with different customs and cultural backgrounds. To adapt to a new home and neighbourhood, immigrant families tend to learn local culture and un-intentionally mixes some of the features of their own culture from home country, in newly learned culture. Such developments on a larger scale, hybrids the culture and local rituals of a place. A second reason for this cultural blend appears to be an intentional move by some of the nations, which rely heavily on their tourism business. Countries such a Thailand, where a major part of GDP comes from the tourism industry, have intentionally modified the look and feel of their local folklore by adding some of the trends from the west. This move is to allure tourists from western countries and boost the economy as a result.
These recently added similarities in modern cultures appear to be a 'value add' in several ways. First and foremost is the 'Ease of doing business' cultural fusion brings with itself. Ability to understand other cultures attracts investors to do business overseas, which in turn creates work opportunities for the locals. Thailand, for instance, has recently added a western dance form 'Salsa' into the list of regional dances, which has motivated a lot of Salsa Learning Academies to set up their offices in Thailand, and this development has resulted in an upsurge in the number of employment opportunities in Music and dance industry of the country. Another positive point could be the feel of connection with a homeland that travellers and immigrants get in a mixed culture, which allows them to enjoy some home-like traditions in the culture of the host country.
In conclusion, Globalization and intentional moves by states to prosper the local economy are the prime reasons why modern cultures look similar as compared to the past. Several supporting factors including rising business opportunities and emotional connections that these modern cultures provide make cultural fusion a positively impacting development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ident, which did not exist in the past. these common traits in modern cultures are th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ocal culture and un-intentionally mixes some of the features of their own culture from home...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to culture'
Suggestion: to culture
...ure from home country, in newly learned culture. Such developments on a larger scale, h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...nd appears to be an intentional move by some of the nations, which rely heavily on their to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 831, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... feel of their local folklore by adding some of the trends from the west. This move is to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21463414634 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85761660048 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531707317073 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5258698404 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220598182471 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756071257217 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584402246741 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154159641383 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646818830618 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.