In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computer, television and art phones this is very harmful to them. To what extent do you agree.
With the inception of technological advancements, human life has become effortless and accessible. However, every product comes with the label of warning on which attention is not paid and ultimately, people suffer. Now-a-days, Juveniles spend all of their leisure time on electronic devices which many people advocate that is not good for their health. I completely agree with the fact but we should also keep in mind how this devices can be a boon if used appropriately.
Admittedly, all the electronic devices produces harmful Ultra-Violet rays which are not adequate for our health, especially children. These rays directly effect our eyes and indirectly, ill-effects on heart are also seen. 60% of children use vision glasses is the silent example of this. Further more, kids use these devices without maintaining proper posture and eventually, they start feeling pain in their back. Apart from these, their character do not develop as they do not spend time on field from where people learn some real-life lessons.
However, exposure of such devices in the early age, make children more intelligent as tinder age is best for learning and using computers and mobiles is the fundamental requirement in the modern era. Since everything is available on internet and adolescents can learn plethora of things from internet without leaving his home town.
Having dwelled on such thoughts, it is clear that mobile phones and computers are like roses with some thrones. Parents should allow their children to use former for limited time and should check that they are using in good way. This will help to get the exposure and also maintain equilibrium.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...act but we should also keep in mind how this devices can be a boon if used appropria...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21348314607 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6756046818 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625468164794 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2481608398 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113070681827 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373366387875 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337103893416 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658873047242 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236739878036 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.