The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Developed nation provides financial aid to starved nation in order to eradicate poverty but various reports show that people still die from hunger in poor countries. It appears that only giving money is not enough to alleviate the quality life in poor countries and I agree that rich nation should provide necessary directions of different types to help other countries to come out of poverty.
There are different reasons that developed nations should assist poor countries other than financial aids. First if all, conditions in poor countries are dismal and people do not have exposure about nutritious food and standards of quality life. As a result, people do not work on right goal which drive them to reduce the poverty. Also, it is seen that under developed nations have less robust democratic system and do not hold the accountability of work being done. In many such nations, money is spent unwise fully or wrong practices are used but still no one is held responsible and situation continues worsening. For instance, in many African countries, vast amount of aid has been given but people are still without water and basic facilities.
Finally, many such nations have no technological access and forced to work in old environment. Many countries used the technology to curb numerous problems like health, education, employment etc. Many of the poor countries have no road or railway lines which make the commuting difficult and benefits are not reached to real beneficiaries. For example, republic of Ghana has only 2% of country road built. With the help of technology; unprivileged countries may develop the infrastructure and facilities which can help to overcome poverty.
To sum-up, though money is crucial for development, there are other kinds of helps such as technology, management, develop robust system is equally important for starved nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21594684385 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73904097244 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1149496282 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28281912542 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953383208785 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965146427292 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168108108222 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633802450162 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.