The money given to help poor countries does not solve the problem of poverty, so rich countries should give other types of help instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Financial support to poor countries does not eradicate the poverty issues, therefore, wealthy nations must think of alternative ways to solve the problem. In my opinion, I completely agree that industrial growth and education can be better options to favour undeveloped regions of the world.
A predominant factor is the necessity of educational support. The knowledge is a vital tool for such countries to gain the requirements and become aware of the society needs. For illustration, the educated society is always aware of their rights and reservations kept by the government, thus law enforcement agencies cannot make them fool. In addition to that, learning science have always benefited the community by providing doctors, engineers and scientists. Hence, the support in teaching the population of a poor country is way far better.
Another important aspect is industrialization. The manufactory units are the main source of generating income for the region. For instance, industries which take raw materials from the local farmers and produced new products from them and the workforce from the locality. Consequently, the farmers, as well as the people working their, will be benefited. By these means, millions of jobs will be created, thus, ultimately helps the nation by creating job market and revenue resources. Moreover, the products manufactured by such units will be used by the nation and in future can export also. Accordingly, the nations will keep working and in future can eliminate poverty.
In conclusion, poverty is the bigger problem for undeveloped nations, providing banking assistance is not sufficient to eradicate the cause. Although, implanting manufacturing units and education plays a crucial role in the development of the nation and making it less poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... by the nation and in future can export also. Accordingly, the nations will keep wor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, hence, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46402877698 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03680006757 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615107913669 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2070328113 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10244473209 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304774748891 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445213339674 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655994170151 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042065011192 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.