With the advent of globalization and job oriented world have changed the food type that people like to eat. An enormous section of the society is relying on ready to eat meals rather than cooked at home. Although, I accord with the benefits of these quick meals but I will explain both these ideas.
It is widely witnessed that food processing industry, especially, associated with instant meals is blooming at very high pace.This is because in this competitive world people want to utilize their time effectively. They want to do the productive things that would make them more stronger either in terms of financial status or etc. Moreover, as world has been transferred into a single global village, hence, many of the people stay without there families and eating such meals is the best they could do. As a matter of fact, such a trend have also boosted the economy because significant proportion of people earning their bread and butter by selling such meals.
On the opposite angle, there are some negative ramifications too for not having home cooked meals. At the top of all is nutrition level because home cooked food is highly hygiene and full of vital elements that are essential for our health. However, authorities are now keeping a close on quality of food sold by vendors that is really an applaudable step for health of people having quick meals. Another demerit point is, people are giving less time to their family which they usually give during morning breakfast. But this was a case earlier, as now even families are taking quick meals sitting together such as milk with oats or ready to eat pasta or noodle.
To recapitulate, it can be accorded that although there exists some negative aspects of having instant eatable items but positive eclipsed them greatly. Having such quick meals during weekdays and enjoying the home cooked on weekends is the best practice that people could make.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ant meals is blooming at very high pace.This is because in this competitive world pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
... productive things that would make them more stronger either in terms of financial status or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est practice that people could make.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94135802469 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41925503504 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58950617284 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8578416075 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185824974179 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622717931682 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373289385967 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10728279319 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377636136964 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.