More and more people use mobile phone and computer with automatic translation, is it more advantages or disadvantages?
Nowadays,more and more people would like to make a photo for translation with mobile phone rather than a dictionary, some people say there are more advantages than disavantages. I will discuss with the following essay.
To begin, machine translator can provid the instant result to whom may need in nesessary. Checking on the dictionary is inefficient in a rapid development time. For example, People may need to understand a strange word in the restaurant for ordering food, mobile phone would be their priority choice to translate. Furthermore, communication has become easier among people from different countries, they can use own language to have a direct conversation through the computer. Because the computer can deliver the output from one language to another language.
In addition, machine translator can be accessed in foreign resourses with affordable price. As we knew, translation is a premium service in all areas, people needs to pay high price to obtain an accurate result from the huaman translator. Otherwise, you need to cost numerous timing on dictionary. With the IT development, machine translator has become free, you can download into your computer or phone, then you can take a photo for translation, you do not cost a cent to understand foreign language.
On the other hand, some people still doubted the accurency from machine translator, especially for professional article. They claim that the result would not be make any sense to read and understant the major point at all.
In conclusion, machine translator can deliver a basic understantding for foreign language in a efficient way, although it still can not simulate as human brain to translate logically, so I believe it has more advantages in future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , more
Nowadays,more and more people would like to make a ph...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rect conversation through the computer. Because the computer can deliver the output fro...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ost numerous timing on dictionary. With the IT development, machine translator has bec...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 91, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sic understantding for foreign language in a efficient way, although it still can not simulate as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 94, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... understantding for foreign language in a efficient way, although it still can no...
^
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ly, so I believe it has more advantages in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98722673946 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7832929247 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212959436663 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626269685361 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895645685961 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127637797038 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1162355296 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.